The Big Heart Disease Lie

Curing Cardiovascular Disease Forever

Get Instant Access

Albaret, J.M. and Thon, B. (1998). Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task. Acta Psychol, 100, 9-24. American Heart Association (2005). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics -2005 Update, American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas.

Baddeley, A.H. and Longman, D.J.A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency on training sessions on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627-635.

Barbeau, H. and Fung, J. (2001). The role of rehabilitation of walking in the neurological population. Curr Opin Neurol, 12(6), 735-740.

Behrman, A.L., Vander Linden, D.W. and Cauraugh, J.H. (1992). Relative frequency knowledge of results: older adults learning a force-time modulation task. J Hum Mov Stud, 23, 233-250.

Bourne, L.E. and Archer, E.J. (1956). Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. J Exp Psychol,

Boyd, L.A. and Winstein, C.J. (2004). Providing explicit information disrupts implicit motor learning after basal ganglia stroke. Learn Memory, 11, 388-396.

Brady, F. (2004). Contextual interference: a meta-analytic study. Percept Motor Skill, 99, 116-126.

Butefisch, C., Hummelsheim, H., Denzler, P. and Mauritz, K.H. (1995). Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci, 130, 59-68.

Cahill, L., McGaugh, J.L. and Weinberger, N.M. (2001). The neu-robiology of learning and memory: some reminders to remember. Trend Neurosci, 24, 578-581.

Cauraugh, J.H. and Kim, S.B. (2003). Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr, 74, 1562-1566.

Chan, L., Beaver, S., MacLehose, R.F., Jha, A., Maciejewski, M. and Doctor, J.N. (2002). Disability and health care costs in the medicare population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, 1196-1201.

Cirstea, M.C., Ptito, A. and Levin, M.F. (2003). Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res, 152 (4), 476-488.

Dancause, N., Ptito, A. and Levin, M.F. (2002). Error correction strategies for motor behavior after unilateral brain damage: short-term motor learning processes. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1313-1323.

Dean, C.M. and Shepherd, R.B. (1997). Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 28(4), 722-728.

DeLisa, J.A. (2004). Shaping the future of medical rehabilitation research: using the interdisciplinary research model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85, 531-537.

Dempster, F.N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In: Memory (eds Bjork, E.L. and Bjork, R.A.), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 317-344.

Dobkin, B.H. (2004). Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol, 3(9), 528-536.

Donovan, J.J. and Radosevich, D.J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don't. J ApplPsychol, 84(5), 795-805.

Doyon, J., Gaudreau, D., Laforce, R., Castonguay, M., Bedard, P.J., Bedard, F. and Bouchard, J.P. (1997). Role of the striatum, cerebellum, and frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomo-tor sequence. Brain Cognit, 34(2), 218-245.

Dromerick, A. (2003). Evidence-based rehabilitation: the case for and against constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev, 40(6), vii-ix.

Druckman, D. and Bjork, R.A. (1991). Optimizing long-term retention and transfer. In: In the Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance (eds Druckman, D. and Bjork, R.A.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 23-56.

Field-Fote, E.C. (2001). Combined use of body weight support, functional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys MedRehabil, 82(6), 818-824.

Fuhrer, M.J. and Keith, R.A. (1998). Facilitating patient learning during medical rehabilitation: a research agenda. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 77(6), 557-561.

Goodwin, J.E., Eckerson, J.M. and Voll, CA (2001). Testing specificity and guidance hypotheses by manipulating relative frequency of KR scheduling in motor skill acquisition. Percept Motor Skill, 93(3), 819-824.

Gordon, J.G. (2000). Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: theoretical and historical perspectives. In: Movement Science. Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation (eds Carr, J. and Shepard, R.), 2nd edn., Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD, pp. 1-30.

Guadagnoli, M.A. and Lee, T.D. (2004). Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Motor Behav, 36(2), 212-224.

Hanlon, R.E. (1996). Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77, 811-815.

Ho, L. and Shea, J.B. (1978). Effects of relative frequency of knowledge of results on retention of a motor skill. Percept Motor Skill, 46(3 Pt 1), 859-866.

Karni, A. (1995). When practice makes perfect. Lancet, 345(8946), 395.

Keith, R.A. and Cowell, K.S. (1987). Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med, 24(6), 529-533.

Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R.C., Twisk, J.W., Lankhorst, G.J. and Koetsier, J.C. (1999). Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral artery stroke: a randomized trial. Lancet, 354, 191-196.

Lai, Q. and Shea, C.H. (1998). Generalized motor program learning: effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. J Motor Behav, 30(1), 51-59.

Lee, T.D. and Genovese, E.D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 59(4), 277-287.

Lee, T.D. and Genovese, E.D. (1989). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: different effects for discrete and continuous tasks. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 60(1), 59-65.

Lee, T.D. and Magill, R.A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cognit, 9(4), 730-746.

Lee, T.D. and Magill, R.A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In: Differing Perspectives in Motor Learning, Memory, and Control (eds Goodman, D., Wilberg, R.B. and Franks, I.M.), Elsevier Science Publishing B.V., North-Holland, pp. 3-22.

Lee, T.D. and Maraj, B.K. (1994). Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 65(3), 244-249.

Lee, T.D., White, M.A. and Carnahan, H. (1990). On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: exploring guidance hypothesis. J Motor Behav, 22(2), 191-208.

Lincoln, N.B., Willis, D., Philips, S.A., Juby, L.C. and Berman, P. (1996). Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke, 27(1), 18-23.

Mackey, F., Ada, L., Heard, R. and Adams, R. (1996). Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77(10), 1066-1070.

Magill, R.A. and Hall, K.G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci, 9, 241-289.

Marley, T.L., Exekiel, H.J., Lehto, N.K., Wishart, L.R. and Lee, T.D. (2000). Application of motor learning principles: the physiotherapy client as a problem-solver. II. Scheduling practice. Physiother Can, 52, 311-316.

Miller, G.A. and Keller, J. (2000). Psychology and neuroscience: making peace. Psychol Sci, 9, 212-215.

Morris, D., Crago, J., Deluca, S., Pidikiti, R. and Taub, E. (1997). Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation, 9, 29-43.

Nudo, R.J., Wise, B.M., SiFuentes, F. and Milliken, G.W. (1996). Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science, 272(5269), 1791-1794.

Ollis, S., Button, C. and Fairweather, M. (2005). The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. Acta Psychol, 118, 229-244.

Pavlides, C., Miyashita, E. and Asanuma, H. (1993). Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol, 70(2), 733-741.

Platz, T., Denzler, P., Kaden, B. and Mauritz, K.H. (1994). Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis. Neuropsychologic 32(10), 1209-1223.

Plautz, E., Milliken, G.W. and Nudo, R.J. (2000). Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Memory, 74, 27-55.

Pohl, P.S. and Winstein, C.J. (1999). Practice effects on the less-affected upper extremity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 668-675.

Pohl, P.S., McDowd, J.M., Filion, D.L., Richards, L.G. and Stiers, W. (2001). Implicit learning of a perceptual-motor skill after stroke. Phys Ther, 81(11), 1780-1789.

Rundek, T., Mast, H., Hartmann, A., Boden-Albala, B., Lennihan, L., Lin, I.F., Paik, M.C. and Sacco, R.L. (2000). Predictors of resources use after acute hospitalization. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology, 55, 1180-1187.

Salmoni, A.W., Schmidt, R.A. and Walter, C.B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull, 95(3), 355-386.

Schmidt, R.A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations. In: Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience (eds Stelmach, G.E. and Requin, J.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 59-75.

Schmidt, RA. and Lee, T.D. (1999). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 3rd edn., Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill.

Schmidt, R.A. and Lee, T.D. (2005) Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioural Emphasis, 4th edn., Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill.

Sekiya, H., Magill, RA., Sidaway, B. and Anderson, D.I. (1994). The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 65(4), 330-338.

Sekiya, H., Magill, R.A. and Anderson, D.I. (1996). The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 67(1), 59-68.

Shea, J.B. and Morgan, R.L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Memory, 5(2), 179-187.

Shea, J.B. and Zimny, S.T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. In: Memory and Control of Action (ed. Magill, R.A.), North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 345-366.

Shea, C.H., Kohl, R. and Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: contributions of practice. Acta Psychol, 73, 145-157.

Skinner, B.F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching, Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk, CT.

Sparrow, W.A. (1995). Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results. Aust J Psychol, 47(2), 97-104.

Sparrow, W.A. and Summers, J.J. (1992). Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reduced frequency presentations of KR. J Motor Behav, 24(2), 197-209.

Sullivan, K., Knowlton, B.J. and Dobkin, B.H. (2002). Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, 683-691.

Sunderland, A. and Tuke, A. (2005). Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 15(2), 81-96.

Swanson, L.R. and Lee, T.D. (1992). Effects of aging and schedules of knowledge of results on motor learning. J Gerontol PsycholSci, 47(6), P406-P411.

Taub, E. and Uswattte, G. (2003). Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med, 419(Suppl.), 34-40.

Taub, E., Crago, J.E., Burgio, L.D., Groomes, T.E. and Cook, E.W. (1994). An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: the role of shaping. J Exp Anal Behav, 61, 281-293.

Taub, E., Uswatte, G. and Morris, D.M. (2003). Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am, 14(Suppl. 1), S77-S91, ix.

Vander Linden, D.W., Cauraugh, J.H. and Greene, T.A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther, 73, 79-87.

Verville, R. and DeLisa, J. (2003). Evolution of National Institutes of Health options for rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 82(8), 565-579.

Weinrich, M., Stuart, M. and Hoyer, T. (2005). Rule for rehabilitation: an agenda for research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 19, 72-83.

Whitall, J. (2004). Stroke rehabilitation research: time to answer more specific questions? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 18, 3-8.

Whyte, J. and Hart, T. (2003). It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 82(8), 639-652.

Winstein, C.J. and Schmidt, R.A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cognit, 16(4), 677-691.

Winstein, C.J. and Prettyman, M.G. (2005) Constraint-induced therapy for functional recovery after brain injury: unraveling the key ingredients and mechanisms. In: Synaptic Plasticity (eds Baudry, M., Bi, X. and Schreiber, S.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

Winstein, C.J., Pohl, P.S. and Lewthwaite, R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 65(4), 316-323.

Winstein, C.J., Merians, A. and Sullivan, K. (1999). Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 37, 975-987.

Winstein, C.J., Miller, J.P., Blanton, S., Morris, D., Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Nichols, D. and Wolf, S. (2003). Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 17, 137-152.

Winstein, C.J., Rose, D.K., Tan, S.M., Lewthwaite, R., Chui, H.C. and Azen, S.P. (2004). A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85, 620-628.

Wishart, L.R. and Lee, T.D. (1997). Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill. Percept Motor Skill, 84(3 Pt 1), 1107-1122.

Wolf, S., Blanton, S., Baer, H., Breshears, J. and Butler, A.J. (2002). Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint induced therapy in stroke. Neurologist, 8, 325-338.

Wolf, S.L., Butler, A.J., Alberts, J.L. and Kim, M.W. (2005). Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 15, 229-239.

Wright, D.L. and Shea, C.H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Res Quart Exercise Sport, 72(1), 32-38.

Wulf, G. and Schmidt, R.A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cognit, 15(4), 748-757.

Wulf, G. and Shea, C.H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonom Bull Rev, 9(2), 185-211.

Wulf, G., Schmidt, R.A. and Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cognit, 19(5), 1134-1150.

Wulf, G., Lee, T.D. and Schmidt, R.A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. J Motor Behav, 16(4), 362-369.

Wulf, G., Shea, C.H. and Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. J Motor Behav, 30(2), 180-192.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
The Donts of Treadmill Buying

The Donts of Treadmill Buying

Though competitive runners are advised to run on the road, there are several reasons why you should buy treadmills anyway. You might have a family which means that your schedule does not have the flexibility it once had.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment